Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17926 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 18:01:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 18:01:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 5293 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 18:01:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 18:01:09 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14UuXV-00081F-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:55:57 +0000 Received: from bru5-smtp-out2.be.uu.net ([194.7.1.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14UuXT-00081A-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:55:55 +0000 Received: from be047304 (uu212-190-9-79.unknown.uunet.be [212.190.9.79]) by bru5-smtp-out2.be.uu.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f1JHtX711500 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:55:37 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <000d01c09a9d$99ffe040$4f09bed4@be047304> From: "Sommereyns Ruddy" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c099e9$33c43420$4ba874d5@w8k3f0> Subject: LF: Re: Fw: Active antenna Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:57:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Hello Dick,
 
This article can be found also ( dutch language) in Elektronika nr 7  1981, page 65/77.
Complete with circuit diagrams and description. I have this article. Werner, ON6ND, has used it ( or still in use ?).
 
73
 
Ruddy
 
ON6UX
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 9:26 PM
Subject: LF: Fw: Active antenna

 
To All from PA0SE
 
It has been mentioned several times that the input stage of an active receiving antenna is easily damaged by lightning in the vicinity due to the very high input impedance of the amplfier.
 
Several years ago Dr. (now professor) E.H. Nordholt of the Technical University Delft in The Netherlands developed an alternative design for an active antenna that does not suffer from this problem.
Instead of making the input impedance very high it has been made very low instead by means of negative feedback. As a result the E-field probe, a piece of copper tube of 50cm long and 3cm diameter, now feeds a current into the FET at the input. Because of the probe's capacitive impedance the current increases with frequency at  6dB/octave.
This is compensated by the negative feedback .
 
The active antenna has a frequency response that is flat from 5kHz to over 30MHz. It stays linear in field strengths up to 10V/m. Great attention has also been given to proper noise behaviour ("noisemanship"). The input is protected by diodes against high voltages. Because signal voltages at the input are very small due to the low input impedance little signal current flows into the diodes and they do not impair the favourable characteristic of the active antenna.
In a test the antenna was not damaged by sparks jumping to the probe from a car ignition coil.
 
I have sent a similar text, together with a circuit diagram, to the reflector before but it may have been too long for distribution.
But particulars can be found in:
 
E.H. Nordholt, D. van Willigen: "A new approach to active antenna design", IEEE Transactions on Ant. and Prop., vol. AP-28, no. 6, November 1980.
 
73, Dick, PA0SE