Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18149 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2001 20:22:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 24 Jan 2001 20:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 27089 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2001 20:26:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 24 Jan 2001 20:26:17 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14LWPb-0000hl-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:20:59 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.111]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14LWPY-0000hg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:20:56 +0000 Received: from [213.1.172.62] (helo=host213-1-172-62.btinternet.com) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14LWPL-0001nv-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:20:44 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Nick" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: More normal CW Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:19:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6888363.980343554953.JavaMail.imail@chilly.excite.com> In-reply-to: <6888363.980343554953.JavaMail.imail@chilly.excite.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 05:39:07 -0800 (PST), you wrote: > but I would >appreciate advice on better waterproofing. Anyone got any good ideas? The standard edict is to waterproof everything as best you can and then leave a hole or two at the bottom to let whatever still got in out again! Nick