Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23328 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 13:15:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 13:15:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9983 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 13:18:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 13:18:09 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14FFcc-0008BD-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2001 13:12:30 +0000 Received: from imo-d08.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.40]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14FFcb-0008B8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2001 13:12:29 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from DL4YHF@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.35.) id l.cb.cfe19d6 (4572) for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:11:52 -0500 (EST) From: DL4YHF@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:11:51 EST Subject: LF: Tests with PSK31, PSK10 and more.. To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 69 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello group, Just did a few tests (off-air) using a slow variant of PSK31 which could be called PSK10, PSK05 etc. Instead of the signaling rate of 31.25 symbols/second from G3PLX's original PSK31, I used only 10 or 5 symbol/second. This reduces the bandwith to 1/3rd or 1/6th of the original PSK31 signal, and thanks to the nice coding scheme used in PSK31, the character transmission speed is still acceptable for a 'real' QSO. ( For those who are not familiar with PSK31: It uses a code set called 'Varicode', which uses fewer bits for frequent letters like 'e' than the others, similar to the Morse code.) To test the effect of the reduced symbol rates, I added white noise to the signal and compared the decoded text with the original PSK31. I decreased the signal/noise ratio until the decoded text became undetectable. The results were as expected: Using "PSK10" instead of "PSK31", the noise could be increased about 3 times in amplitude for the same detection quality. However, if you want to test the 'slow PSK31 variants' on air. Because all PSK31 programs I had did not support other symbol rates than 31.25sym/sec, I modfied the PSK modulator and detector from WinPSK (by AE4JY) and stuffed them into Spectrum Lab. I just uploaded a new release of SpecLab (V1.63) with a built-in 'digimode terminal'. It is available at www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/spectra1.html. Beta testers are welcome. Bug reports please to DL4YHF@qsl.net. How about some 'QRPP' tests, Geri ? ------------ snip ------------ Drifting frequency of DF0WD's CW signal: The problem is a result of the poor stability of the main oscillator in my old Icom IC706. The fan blows warm air from the final amp towards the 'master crystal'. I watched the Loran lines yesterday, and found them 'wandering' around the sreen for about 30 seconds after one over (using only normal CW here). I thought about buying a 'TCXO' for the IC706, but the cost of about 120euro for that tiny piece of PCB kept me off. Any better ideas ? ----------- snip ----------- 73's Wolf (DL4YHF, qrv on LF only from DF0WD).