Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11486 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 19:41:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 19:41:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 29740 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 19:44:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 19:44:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Mb9b-0003mm-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 19:36:55 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from d12lmsgate.de.ibm.com ([195.212.91.199]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Mb9a-0003mh-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 19:36:54 +0000 Received: from d12relay02.de.ibm.com (d12relay02.de.ibm.com [9.165.215.23]) by d12lmsgate.de.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id UAA21620 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:36:09 +0100 Received: from usa.net (ss10.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.76]) by d12relay02.de.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id UAA190898 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:36:07 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A7322C1.A2927B65@usa.net> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:34:25 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" Organization: Undisclosed X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: This and that References: <3A7246CB.FF3090A0@alg.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Steve Rawlings wrote: > [snip] > I agree. But, if QRSS is such an ideal mode, why do QRSS > operators need to use the whole of our tiny 2.1 kHz allocation to > do it? > [snip] A QRSS signal takes less than 1 Hz of band. Any greater 'apparent' band occupancy is to blame on the receiver. 73 Alberto I2PHD