Return-Path: Received: (qmail 270 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 16:31:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2001 16:31:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 12666 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 16:25:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 9 Jan 2001 16:25:37 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14G1RK-0004G9-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:16:02 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [213.2.16.106] (helo=rsgb.org.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14G1RJ-0004G4-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:16:01 +0000 Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.7.5.R) for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:09:34 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:09:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: ARGO Build 113. Message-ID: <3A5B37BB.11936.1878C3D@localhost> In-reply-to: X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: This really is a nice piece of software. It is easy to run, is very sensitive and continues to run when you are working on another program in a foreground window. I really like the easy switch from entire band waterfall to narrow band scrolling, but I find the frequency accuracy on the display is not good. When changing from wide to narrow, the displayed frequency (shown as the frequency of the strongest signal) can alter by tens of Hertz, and when moving the scrolling display from the bottom to the top of the band the frequency display becomes inaccurate. Is this a function of the software, the clock on my computer or my sound card? It isn't really a problem as I can calibrate against 60kHz on the second VFO on the Rx, but it would be nice if the display was consistent. I am using the 'squared' display which seems more sensitive for very weak signals than normal. Well done and thanks. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net