Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28328 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2001 02:20:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 24 Jan 2001 02:20:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 13808 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2001 02:23:56 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 24 Jan 2001 02:23:56 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14LFWR-0004GC-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:18:55 +0000 Received: from indyweb.cgocable.ca ([205.151.69.200]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14LFWP-0004G7-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:18:53 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from 220-163.lr.cgocable.ca (220-163.lr.cgocable.ca [24.226.220.163]) by indyweb.cgocable.ca (8.9.3 (MessagingDirect 1.0.4)/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA487929 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:18:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <200101240218.VAA487929@indyweb.cgocable.ca> X-Sender: bill1@cgocable.ca X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:17:11 -0500 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Bill de Carle" Subject: Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: At 01:01 AM 1/24/01 +0100, Uwe wrote: >James Moritz schrieb: >> Dear LF Group, >> >> So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal >> tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything >> that stands much chance of seeing either signal will easily >> seperate them too. I don't think there are any Loran lines on this >> frequency - if there are, or any other problems please let me know. >> I hope to start around 2200, and will be sending the 90s dashes >> signal I described before, together with occasional CW IDs. I will >> carry on until I get thoroughly fed up!! >> >> Cheers, Jim Moritz >> 73 de M0BMU >> >Hi Jim, Hi Laurie, >report here in jo43sv for both signals: `o` or 579. used ant: LW of >lambda/4 length without preamp. exactly btwn ur signal-lines is a >loran-c-line, but vy weak. >regards >Uwe/dj8wx I am seeing a pair of weak lines straddling what seems to be a Loran C line (strong here) - but I don't have any way to be sure these lines correspond to Laurie's and Jim's signals. At the settings I'm using the frequency resolution is good (0.016 Hz) but each pixel covers some 62.44 seconds of time so I don't have any chance of seeing any actual keying; I figure I'm lucky just to detect their presence, hi! It would help a great deal if someone over there who is able to receive these signals at good strength could measure their exact frequencies so I can pin them down at this end. If you can't measure absolute frequency, at least it should be possible to measure the difference between the two signals if you can see them both on the screen at the same time. Thanks in advance. Fingers still crossed :-) Bill VE2IQ