Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9478 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 07:22:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 07:22:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 15145 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 07:26:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 07:26:31 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MPeL-0000PL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 07:19:53 +0000 Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.93] helo=rhenium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MPeK-0000PG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 07:19:52 +0000 Received: from [213.122.24.33] (helo=dave) by rhenium with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14MPe7-00063c-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 07:19:40 +0000 Message-ID: <004c01c08831$c16d1360$7c4901d5@dave> From: "Dave Sergeant" To: "rsgb_lf_group" References: <3A7246CB.FF3090A0@alg.demon.co.uk> <001b01c0881e$d911e940$0301a8c0@steve> Subject: LF: Re: Re: This and that Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 06:56:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >From Dave G3YMC Steve Olney wrote: >C'mon Steve, lighten up. If your local world is giving you a hard time >there is no need to clobber all and sundry. Better still, migrate to >Australia as MAL suggested some time back. We have about one-fifth the >population and probably 10 times the space. I guarantee I can find you an >outback property that definitely will not have a LF station within 1000km >and most likely no inhabitants except goannas, snakes, emus and kangaroos >within that radius as well. Whatever your view such comments do not help one iota. Steve GW4ALG made some valid points and a less hostile response from someone who earlier in the week was recommending a code of practice would have been appropriate. We all know you are not a cw operator and clearly feel strongly about that. However cw is very far from dead in amateur radio terms as a quick listen on the hf bands during any dxpedition or contest will show - it is actually increasing. Have a listen on top band tonight, I expect CQWW 160 cw is just as busy with you as it is here. Please stop the mud slinging. 73s Dave G3YMC dsergeant@btinternet.com dsergeant@iee.org http://www.btinternet.com/~dsergeant