Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13176 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2001 18:14:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2001 18:14:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 23513 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2001 18:17:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 14 Jan 2001 18:17:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14HrcB-0001bR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:10:51 +0000 Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.195.173]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Hrc9-0001bM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:10:50 +0000 Received: from modem-197.oxygen.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.7.197] helo=default) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 14Hrbw-0002Aa-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:10:37 +0000 Message-ID: <003d01c07e54$877c5940$c507883e@default> From: "MAL HAMILTON" To: "rsgb" Subject: LF: Loading Coils Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:04:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Dave Sorry to hear about your misfortune and I hope you get it all going again soon. The correct place for antenna loading coils are directly beneath the vertical drop wire of the vertical if it is base loaded, or hanging vertically if centre loaded. During the early 1960 period there was a debate going on about where to locate the loading coil for 160m on short vertical fixed antennas and mobile installations. The consensus of opinions after testing was NOT to screen the base loading coils because they contributed to the radiation of the signal. This was also the case on 160m mobiles. Those with the loading coils in the boot/trunk of the car and screened radiated a weaker signal than those with the base loaded coil exposed at the base of the normally 8 feet vertical. Field strength tests at rallies confirmed this given that those tested were running the same rf power. Any vertical that I have ever used for MF or LF that needed a base loaded coil had it positioned vertically at the bottom of the vertical wire drop and this works very efficiently, any derivation from this degrades the radiation efficiency of the system. Locking loading coils up in farady cages is bad procedure on 73/136 khz with the power levels we are using. It was also found that long narrow loading coils positioned vertically at the base of the vertical and not screened, radiated more efficiently than SQUARE coils. I expect the long narrow loading coil acted like a continuation of the vertical getting more like a helical wound vertical. Wind you coils with teflon insulated 2.5mm or larger wire, get them outside at the base of the vertical in the rain, snow, frost, wind etc to keep them cool and you will not have any problems. G3KEV