Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19948 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 14:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 14:39:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 21489 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 14:42:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 14:42:41 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MWRL-0002P4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:34:55 +0000 Received: from amersham.mail.uk.easynet.net ([195.40.1.45]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MWRK-0002Oz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:34:54 +0000 Received: from ericadodd (tnt-13-156.easynet.co.uk [212.134.22.156]) by amersham.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 42D4B1B185 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:33:28 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <002401c0886e$6949d3c0$9c1686d4@ericadodd> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <008701c0864a$3cc020a0$0301a8c0@steve> <006701c087c8$f786f600$995c01d5@z0w6t5> Subject: LF: Re: Bandwidth and receivers Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:09:01 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Bill, G0AKY said > All agreed in principal but there is one nail you forgot the LF band hr is > only just over 2Khz wide I get the impression from Bill's comment that he, and others, think QRSS is a wide band mode. All other things being equal the bandwidth is inversely proportional to the data rate, which means the bandwith for a QRSS signal is much less than a standard CW signal. You can check this out for yourself by just looking at these signals with QRSS SW. When we do the transatlantic tests we often have a group of signals transmitting a few Hz apart and each one is perfectly readable (see Ko Versteeg's .JPG on page 98 of the LF Experimenter's book). The main limitation of having two CW signals closer than, say, 100Hz apart is the receiver filter. You can have very narrow filters. I have a level meter with a 20Hz filter that certainly selects one signal from the other and you can read CW with it provided it isn't sent too quickly. Its main problem is that it converts every bit of noise and QRM to a tone the same as the signal you are receiving and this is very 'wearing' after a short while. Most problems with receivers are due to front end non-linearity. The worst receiver I have used that has this problem is the Daytong converter. Nevertheless, this converter can provide excellent 'ears' (as G3XDV can attest) provided steps are taken to reduce the input with an attenuator and/or preselector if you are using a large antenna. The problem often arises when you change from a small antenna to a big antenna. You often see it with a special event station using a big antenna put out a huge signal but have problems hearing anyone. Seasoned LF DXpeditioners, such as the 'Two Daves and a Graham' take with them their pet receiver front end signal level box. When I operate from GB2CPM the Loran comes pounding in at S9. I have to insert some 18dB of front end attenuation plus the AIP before the weak signals become readable. I live only a few miles from Laurie, G3AQC. His signal with me is S9 +35dB. (I guess I must be as strong with him). I am able to operate on the band the same time he is on provided I use the attenuators and provided I don't get too close in frequency! Regards, Peter, G3LDO