Message-ID: <001801c07a84$36f261a0$873097d4@oemcomputer>
From: "Johan Bodin" <sm6lkm.jbeab@swipnet.se>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: SV: Re: VE1ZZ "M" in Sweden (?)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:36:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Mike 'XDV and All

Yes, it must have been VE1ZZ. I got even better copy on his 0100Z
transmission.

Regarding blurred dots:
Yes, I am well aware that the BW was (at least theoretically) too narrow
for Jack's speed.

I used Argo beta 113 and tried both 3s and 10s settings. I found that
that the 10s setting gave a better overall readability despite the
smearing.

It would certainly help if Jack slowed down to 10s/dot - but that requires
approx. 5dB higher patience level at the receiving end, hi..

73
Johan SM6LKM

>========
>I think I saw VE1ZZ on 135.502. With a little imagination,
>"1ZZ" can be seen in the attached picture. The transmission
>ended, or disappeared into QSB, at 00.42 UTC.
>73 de Johan SM6LKM
>===========
>
>Johan,
>
>It is certain that your spectrogram shows VE1ZZ but you have the averaging
>set too high (or the bandwidth too low) which is why the dots are blurred.
>
>Mike, G3XDV