Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28555 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2001 15:03:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2001 15:03:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 23465 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2001 14:57:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 22 Jan 2001 14:57:18 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14KiIL-0001tG-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:50:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.26] helo=tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14KiIK-0001sf-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:50:08 +0000 Received: from server1 ([209.226.189.21]) by tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010122144923.YZAI11735.tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@server1> for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:49:23 -0500 Message-ID: <000d01c08482$65847b90$0a00a8c0@ThreeLakes.ca> From: "Larry Kayser" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <12841.200101221318@gemini> Subject: LF: Re: VA3LK Log / More Tests Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:48:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Greetngs All: I will NOT be transmitting on LF during the period of February 2 at 00 utc to about 12 utc February 5th. This is the period during which I operate in the FOC Marathon CW activity which is now the only organized on air social activity I participate in. I could however let run the LF receiving system during that period on a single frequency with about 2 Hz of bandwidth maximum. Once I have had my annual dose of operating activity I will get back to the LF program. For those of you who may not be aware, my remote HF station is co-located with the LF transmitter in the same building and the LF transmitter does a serious hammer job on the HF station receiver. The TS-570 is a great little radio, but the RF noise from the LF transmitter, some 10 feet away in the same room, prevents simultaneous HF operation below 20 meters most of the time. Larry VA3LK