Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12759 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2001 21:16:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2001 21:16:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2490 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2001 21:10:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 21 Jan 2001 21:10:53 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14KRfK-0005sL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:04:46 +0000 Received: from chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net ([195.40.1.44]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14KRfJ-0005sG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:04:45 +0000 Received: from ericadodd (tnt-6-202.easynet.co.uk [195.40.201.202]) by chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4413CF853F for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:03:37 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <000901c083ed$fe2ca380$cac928c3@ericadodd> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Pyrotechnic insulators and CT1DRP Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:05:21 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: My antenna is a sort of two-wire inverted (cross between an inverted L and a V) as shown in Fig 4.9 of the LF Experimenter's Handbook. The top spacer was insulated from the mast by a couple of ceramic insulators shown in Fig 4.10. While testing this antenna prior to the VE1ZZ tests a dramatic and noisy pyrotechnic display occurred across one of these insulators . I lowered the antenna and cleaned the insulators and the problem seemed to go away. But it occurred again. I inspected the insulator and found it was cracked all round and that the top spacer was only held by the other insulator. I modified the antenna so that the spacer was fixed directly to the mast and the wires supported by a couple of PA0SE brown ceramic insulators. The antenna was tried several times and, apart from a reduction in antenna capacitance, it worked fine. Today I had a phone call from Brian, CT1DRP. We have conducted several tests in the past - he has received my 136kHz and 73kHz signals and I have received his 136kHz signals but we never have had a QSO. Brian had renewed his mast (damaged in gales) and cut lopped some trees and could now get 2amps into his antenna with 200watts. We decided on a QRSS QSO. I checked the band at 1630 and it was clear of signals. Due to some restrictions we decided on 136.4kHz (at the risk of being 'flamed' again on e-mail by a couple of CW only operators). I transmitted to Brian and he transmitted to me - we were both receiving each other very well. When I put it over for an acknowledgement of my report -nothing! The receiver was dead. The problem turned out to be the antenna. The nylon cord fixing the insulator to the spacer had broken - no sign of any burning. It had been raining heavily all day today. I replaced the nylon cord with copper wire and tried again later. This time (1820) we made it, conditions not so good with the signal down and QRN up. Brian is going to improve the operating set-up. He also has a Decca transmitter so look out for a good signal from CT1 in the future. Regards, Peter, G3LDO