Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17131 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 19:11:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 19:11:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 21630 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 19:05:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 27 Jan 2001 19:05:59 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MaVv-0003XR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 18:55:55 +0000 Received: from mail2.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.210]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MaVu-0003XM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 18:55:54 +0000 Received: from modem-111.antimony.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.42.111] helo=default) by mail2.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 14MaVh-00046Y-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 18:55:42 +0000 Message-ID: <000301c08891$f5613d80$6f2a883e@default> From: "MAL HAMILTON" To: "rsgb" Subject: LF: IC706 STAB Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 18:49:18 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello to Mike and Co I use an IC706 as a vfo on 13.6/7.3 mhz and divide by 100 to get on 73/136 khz. I also use it on 136 rx with the pre amp in. I have found it totally stable and satisfactory for both functions. There are a couple of points about the 706 on rx. With a small antenna it is DEAF but with a large antenna like mine it is more than adequate with the internal rf amp switched on and in some cases I have to switch the pre amp off for best signal over noise. In conjunction with the 706 I use an external dsp unit that reduces the bandwidth to a few hertz. I also have the 250 hz cw filter fitted. I also use an IC 746 modified to eliminate the birdie around 137 khz, an FT 1000 and they are marginally better than the 706 with my antenna system. I have tried an FT 847 and although useable and sensitive/selective enough suffers a little from cross mod. around the 136 band. I have owned a TS 850 and TS 50 in the past and find them very good also, but no better than the above equipment with my particular antenna system, which is 3 x inv L antennas suspended from the top of a 120 feet mast and each one is 300 feet long(if you prefer metres divide by 3 to give you a rough estimate, bearing in mind that there are 39.37 inches to 1 metre, and 12 inches to 1 foot) Some one in the UK said recently that they and their friends never heard of feet and inches. The same people probably cannot COUNT either in metric without a Calculator The trend at University in recent years is to pass exams using a TICK TEST, where the answer is already in front of the student, if that fails use a Calculator and if that fails the student is stuck. The pass mark I understand is anything from 35 - 40 % who could FAIL? In my days one was expected to get a min of 60% for a pass and most achieved in excess of 70% plus. Is it any wonder we have so many DUDS. The GCSE examinations at present are graded from A - G and some are proposing A - Z so that no one will be disappointed, higher education is little better. Just think if the pass mark is as low as 35% for a subject then the person lacks 65% knowledge about the topic - UNBELIEVABLE. Is the UK the only Country that has this system. ? de G3KEV