Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18896 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2000 22:52:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Dec 2000 22:52:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 23720 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2000 22:54:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 21 Dec 2000 22:54:34 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 149EUw-0007fW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:47:42 +0000 Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 149EUu-0007fP-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:47:40 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.35.) id l.d8.2f249 (9651) for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:45:44 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:45:44 EST Subject: Re: LF: Hamble School of Yachting.htm To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: In a message dated 12/21/00 2:23:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, m5cix@cwcom.net writes: << I am surprised that anyone had problems with Netscape. >> I'm not. As a webmaster who tries to keep our pages as widely readable as possible, I've been trying to write them in strict accord with HTML 3.2 and 4 standards, but I keep finding Netscape to be less and less compliant with those standards. My first thought when the AOL e-mail client presented me with the raw HMTL code, and then when Martin wrote that the mail went everywhere except where it was intended, was that a worm may be at work in the ActiveX control. This still may be true, or it may simply be an incompatibility with Netscape. Either way, Martin, you may want to have someone with good antivirus tools and extensive knowledge of Netscape to check it out. As for this reflector, I encourage the powers that be to implement a filter to remove HTML code from posts. We had to do that on the LWCA Longwave Message Board, particularly because it's open to everyone. It has saved a lot of headaches. 73, John