Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7030 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2000 20:08:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Dec 2000 20:08:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 8254 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2000 20:03:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 31 Dec 2000 20:03:22 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Cob1-0002Sz-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:56:47 +0000 Received: from jubilee.ns.sympatico.ca ([142.177.1.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Coaz-0002Su-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:56:46 +0000 Received: from ns.sympatico.ca ([142.177.41.153]) by jubilee.ns.sympatico.ca (Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-68925U141000L141000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:56:26 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A4FD5E1.2C54C29C@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:57:05 -0500 From: "John Currie" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-DIAL (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: LF Test freqs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Markus I dont think things are as hopeless as you think in the first place I would expect that the bandwidth of the Greek station is concentrated over 2 or 3 kHZ. The power is concentrated in the spectral lines caused by the keying. The lines are approximately 90 Hz apart, with little energy between the spectral lines. I saw the main line often this summer and fall when looking for Eu signals but didnt knoe what it was. I believe if you look at the picture I sent over of G0MRF sending RO and OOO, you will see the carrier of the Greek station. I am afraid that CFH can come on at anytime again in the near future and i am also afraid That 135.7 will be better than 135.9 at Jack's QTH as he lives much closer to CFH than I do. I think Jack may have a xtal for 136.0 kHz I would prefer that anyone trying to come easst to North America would use 135.7 to 135.8 Will anyone want to transmit tonight or tmw nite? MarkusVester@aol.com wrote: > Hi everybody, > > John wrote: > > I hear the Greek station weakly but dont belive it will > > stop receptoin below 135.8. > > Laurie wrote: > > I will try to be on after New Year celibrations and could > > use either my old freq. 135.722 or the new one 135.922. > > ... I'm afraid its an illusion that any of our amateur signals will make it > across on top of SVX. Just consider: If it has say 10 kW spread over 100 Hz > bandwidth and _if_ it is attenuated by additional 10 dB traveling over the > continent, this would still be the equivalent of 5 W in a BW of 1/2 Hz. If > John does not hear it loud its simply due to the fact that condx to EU were > not good enough for a contact. > > So my opinion, for a penny's worth: As long as CFH is off, let's use the qrss > segment at the upper end of the band, between 137.77 and 137.8. When CFH > comes back, stick to the 135.9 ... 136.0 plan. > > Happy New Year, take care > Markus