Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20130 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2000 22:56:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Dec 2000 22:56:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 14083 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2000 22:51:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 29 Dec 2000 22:51:07 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14C8Bx-00012a-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 22:40:05 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from d06lmsgate-2.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.2]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14C8Bt-000128-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 22:40:01 +0000 Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate-2.uk.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id WAA130052 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 22:25:22 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from usa.net (ss7.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.72]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id WAA149426 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 22:39:20 GMT Message-ID: <3A4D1286.F3B7C48F@usa.net> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:39:02 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" Organization: Undisclosed X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Ideas for a Slow CW-Viewer References: <50.f61cb99.277df99c@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: DL4YHF@aol.com wrote: > Hello Alberto and Group, > > I have some ideas for a 'Slow-CW-Viewer' (some of them have been implemented > in Spectrum Lab, others in Spectran, others not at all...) > How about this : > [snip] Wolf and the group, thanks for your contribution. Some of your ideas are quite acceptable, and I will implement them, some others, like the dB scale and the grid, perhaps are more suited, IMHO, for general purpose programs, like your fine SpecLab, and less for a specific viewer for QRSS and DFCW. About the saving of the FFT bins to a file for a later post-processing, that's a very good idea. As you said, a common format would be very desirable. I will give a thought to this, and perhaps will come out with a first skeleton for the format. 73 and Happy New Millennium to everybody Alberto I2PHD