Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22179 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2000 23:17:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 23:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 19031 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2000 23:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 23:20:14 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 144A43-0004R4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:02:59 +0000 Received: from laguna.tiscalinet.it ([195.130.224.86]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 144A41-0004Qz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:02:58 +0000 Received: from tiscalinet.it (62.10.85.170) by laguna.tiscalinet.it; 8 Dec 2000 00:01:48 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A301459.F38C5F40@tiscalinet.it> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:51:05 +0100 From: "Claudio" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz transmission tests References: <3A2F4439.6553B511@alg.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Steve and all, OK for the suggestion. I'm sorry but for now I can't change the frequency because I transmit from my holiday home and I'm using a 27 Mhz CB Xtal on my transmitter. In my usual home I have two other Xtals, one for 135.975 kHz and the other one for 137.525 kHz. May be that one of those is good for a beacon? For the next week-end I change the frequency according yours suggestions. 73 de Claudio, IK2PII Steve Rawlings wrote: > > Hi Claudio! > You wrote: > > I'm planning to transmit some slow CW beacon from 7 to 10 > > december. My working conditions: QRG 136.375 kHz, > > Pout about 100W, 30 m wire antenna, > > QTH locator is jn45pu 50 km north Milano. > 136.375 kHz is not a very appropriate frequency for a beacon, as > it falls within the portion of the band 136.0 to 137.4 kHz > normally used for two-way conventional CW. I wonder whether you > have an alternative frequency? > > Regards to all, > Steve GW4ALG -- Claudio Pozzi http://www.qsl.net/ik2pii happy Linux user E-Mail: ----------------------------------------------------------------------