Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5506 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2000 07:36:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2000 07:36:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19129 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2000 07:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 18 Dec 2000 07:39:14 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 147uiL-0001We-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:28:05 +0000 Received: from ds-img-6.compuserve.com ([149.174.206.139] helo=spdmgaaf.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 147uiK-0001WZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:28:04 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spdmgaaf.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) id CAA20225 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 02:27:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 02:27:02 -0500 From: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" Subject: LF: OM2TW To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200012180227_MC2-BF02-814C@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rich, OM2TW wrote: >I was on my LF site during this saturday, but I burn all my mosfets. >Something is wrong with my power amplifier. After a few weeks of problemless >operation, one mosfet has been broken.< ... do those FETs come with a build-in expiry date? I, too, have broken a couple of them during the weekend (well, I must admit, I tried to run the G0MRF PA on a 56 Volt rail instead of the usual 28 Volt I normally use ... what I found out is that the length of sparks that are crerated when the FETs explode is directly proportional to the voltage ... *very* impressive!). When I changed back to 28 Volt (partly with new FETs) and tried to re-adjust the bias, another one burned (... yes, with a smaller spark, as expected). Maybe this is due to mixing IRFP450 with the "new" type IRFP450A (but the data sheets I retrieved from the Internet show absolutely no difference in the performance data ... or did I miss something?). Question: Anyone tried to replace the IRFP450 with the IRFP460? Seems to have only half the RD-on, all other data look quite the same. I found a source where they cost 6.10 DM and I would like to give them a try. Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)