Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23695 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2000 14:36:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2000 14:36:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 14279 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2000 14:38:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 9 Dec 2000 14:38:51 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 144l1w-0004g5-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:31:16 +0000 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 144l1u-0004fv-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:31:14 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from [147.197.200.44] (helo=gemini) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #4) id 144kzO-0006h7-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:28:38 +0000 Message-ID: <1834.200012091431@gemini> From: "James Moritz" Organization: University of Hertfordshire To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 14:34:15 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: CFA Antennas X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear Martin and LF Group, The CFA antenna has been doing the rounds for a while - the problem is, like most "miracle" antennas, it does not seem to live up to it's claims in real life. Nobody, including the inventors, seem to be able to get reproducible results from the CFA; clearly, it does radiate some signal, but as amateurs are well aware, just about any bit of metal can be coaxed into radiating a reasonable signal some of the time. At least one Australian broadcast station found that their CFA antenna worked better tuned against ground in a conventional manner, rather than using the "crossed field" principle. The anecdote about the Egyptian broadcast station does not really stand scrutiny - a lambda/4 MF broadcast antenna should have an efficiency of 80% or more, so to get 6dB improvement, the CFA would have to radiate 4 times more power, ie. 320% efficiency, or more than 3 times as much power as is being fed into it from the transmitter. The other possibility is that the comparison antenna was extremely inefficient, for reasons unknown. A 6.5m tall CFA scaled from 1.16MHz to 136kHz would be 55m tall - basically funnel shaped, a solid metal cylinder around10 metres in diameter, with a big cone made of mesh about the same diameter as the height for top loading, driven against a solid metal ground plane. So it really should be quite efficient, whether it embodies any new operating principles or not, and could not be called "small" by amateur standards. Unfortunately, the CFA seems to have got surrounded by a lot of "pseudoscientific" hype, so it is difficult to tell serious information about it from the junk. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU