Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16970 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 17:03:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 17:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 18723 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 17:06:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 17:06:12 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14BgPn-0002tp-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:00:31 +0000 Received: from bucky-rwcmex.excite.com ([198.3.99.218] helo=bucky.excite.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14BgPm-0002tK-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:00:30 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from almond.excite.com ([199.172.148.82]) by bucky.excite.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122) with ESMTP id <20001228165949.HZWO25756.bucky.excite.com@almond.excite.com> for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:59:49 -0800 Message-ID: <14471390.978022789927.JavaMail.imail@almond.excite.com> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:59:45 -0800 (PST) From: "john sexton" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: EasyGram 1.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Excite Inbox X-Sender-Ip: 62.253.64.5 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Petr, This made me laugh, because you could say I am in the same business (writing software professionally since 1964) and I know only too well how easy it is to make a mistake and how you don't find it until it has just gone out of the door to a customer. So for this reason I have learnt that new versions must not be sent out straight away. It needs to mature a while in house. Alan tells me that you have an interest in Loop antennas. I have been using Loops for receive for a couple or more years now with great success. My vertical picks up a lot of local noise and is almost unusable for receive. Recently I completed a variation on the KI0LE design which is now working really well, about 12 dB better than the G3LNP loop. However it is sensitive to noise pick-up, so it depends on the time of day and local QRM. Ideally a loop should be screened, but that is impractical with the new design (too much wind resistance). It is particularly good for me at night, when the local noise seems to disappear. I have described my experiences on my web site: www.g4cnn.f2s.com If you need any more information, such as constructional details, please let me know. 73 John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/