Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24685 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2000 12:58:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Dec 2000 12:58:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 24255 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2000 13:00:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 31 Dec 2000 13:00:53 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Ci1M-0000tJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:55:32 +0000 Received: from smtp-1.visp.telinco.net ([212.1.130.1]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Ci1L-0000tE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:55:31 +0000 Received: from [212.1.135.26] (helo=g4jnt) by smtp-1.visp.telinco.net with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Chtt-0005OU-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:47:50 +0000 Message-ID: <004c01c07328$9e15f8a0$1a8701d4@g4jnt> From: "Andrew Talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: New Years wish Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:53:04 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: The EVM56002 is obsolete anyway, they are like gold dust now !! Motorola do an updated one with the 56300 (??) but it is very expensive and will need EVM software to be modified. Is 16 bits essential ? This makes interfacing a bit complex. Interfacing via the parallel port is easy enough in DOS and WIN 3.1 but in WIN9x it is a bit hit and miss depending on the ports implementation. 16 bits via the serial port beeds really three bytes per sample. It can of course be sent directly as two 8 bit words, but there is no way of keeping in sync and knowing which word is high / low etc. By transmitting the 16 bits over 3 words, check bits can be included to positively identify which word is which out of the frame of three. However, by using 14 bits of data per sample (still well over 80dB dynamic range) two 8 bit samples are possible, allowing one bit per word to identify high/low data. Andy G4JNT -----Original Message----- From: Larry Kayser To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: 31 December 2000 03:44 Subject: LF: New Years wish >Greetings: > >Simple and succinct. A 16 bit A to D converter board that Alberto di Bene, >Bill de Carle can make their software work with so we can go to the next >level of digging in the noise. With the return of AMSAT big bird there will >not be a large number of EVM56002 protoboards available at low cost so the >need for an A to D board for general DSP is needed.. > >Board could work with either a Serial port or a Parallel port. > >Happy New Year to all. > >Larry >VA3LK > > > > >