Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18535 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2000 10:47:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Dec 2000 10:47:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9518 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2000 10:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 9 Dec 2000 10:42:25 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 144hJ6-0003lK-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:32:44 +0000 Received: from email.cwcom.net ([195.44.0.153] helo=cwcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 144hJ5-0003lF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:32:43 +0000 Received: from computer ([195.44.204.113]) by cwcom.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:32:37 +0000 Message-ID: <001101c061ce$0d51dd40$71cc2cc3@computer> From: "Martin M5CIX" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c061be$e91f5880$e52f883e@default> Subject: LF: Crossed Field Antenna Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:50:21 -0000 Organization: M5CIX / G8CIX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: My attention has recently been drawn to the concept of the Cross Field Anntena. Which if it works might be the solution to problems of power and sixe. I quote the attached snipit from the antennex web site. "Let me tell you about one example, lest you think this is all for naught: A CFA only 21 feet (6.5 Meters) tall, located at Tanta in the center of Egypt, provides AM broadcast service at 1.16 MHz (258 Meters) to millions of people from Cairo north to the coast. Certified measurements provide evidence that this small CFA produces a radiated signal almost 6 dB stronger than the previous 1/4 wavelength vertical broadcast tower which was 211 feet (65 Meters) tall. To express the performance a different way >> with the tall tower, a 100,000 watt transmitter was required for the desired coverage. With the miniature CFA the same coverage was attained with the transmitter power reduced to 30,000 watts." The following site will be of interest. http://www.luminet.net/~wenonah/cfa/ http://www.antennex.com/preview/cfa/cfa.htm http://www.radioworld.com/reference-room/Cross-Field-Antenna/2000/rw-rackley 1-doc.html http://www.wbeonline.com/html/2000/Oct.news/crossfield_10_23_00.htm Martin M5CIX