Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25116 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2000 14:08:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2000 14:08:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 30871 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2000 13:24:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cask.force9.net) (195.166.128.29) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 26 Jun 2000 13:24:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 23730 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2000 11:40:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by cask.force9.net with SMTP; 26 Jun 2000 11:40:31 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 136XCJ-0001Hn-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:37:03 +0100 Received: from mserv1d.u-net.net ([195.102.240.96]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 136XCH-0001Hi-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:37:02 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from rsgb.u-net.com ([195.102.80.225] helo=rsgb.org.uk) by mserv1d.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #36) id 136XF0-0006bD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:39:50 +0100 Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.7.4.R) for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:20:00 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:19:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: Re: CFH and solar event?? In-reply-to: <004101bfdd63$4d8eacc0$0a00a8c0@server1.ThreeLakes.ca> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Message-ID: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: > So we might think that it took some 10 hours for the faster material to > get here, or was it the real fast stuff the occured as you heard the > signal? The only time I have recorded an enhancement of the reception of CFH coincided exactly with a major flare so the suggestion is "the real fast stuff". If true, this is bad news as we really need some warning if we are to make the best of a short enhancement. Interestingly this occasion was the day after some other flares, so perhaps it needs both. See http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/mike/cfh.htm Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm