Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12442 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2000 09:49:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2000 09:49:12 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 1368rX-00062A-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:37:59 +0100 Received: from smtp01.wxs.nl ([195.121.6.61]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 1368rW-000625-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:37:58 +0100 Received: from nl9222tvtref.nl ([195.121.219.64]) by smtp01.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with ESMTP id AAA6E40 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:37:26 +0200 From: "Ko Versteeg" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: SMT Hell Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:35:32 +0200 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <7736882DE8D.AAA6E40@smtp01.wxs.nl> Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Andy.. Using SpectroGram here, any idea what the best value for the time scale in msec is. Running it at 3000Msec now but traces are very weak. 73 de Ko, NL9222 ---------- > From: Andy Talbot > To: LF Group > Subject: LF: SMT Hell > Date: Saturday, June 24, 2000 11:53 PM > > For information, I am transmitting a 2.5 Hz wide SMT Hell signal > continuously on 137.6kHz with pixel duration 2s. Use Spectran at 0.031 Hz > resolution and about 40 - 50% speed, averaging off. Power output is 5 > Watts RF to the antenna, about -33dBW ERP. > > However, there may be a short break sometime tomorrow (Sunday) while I > re-route the coax feed to the antenna. > > Andy G4JNT >