Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23772 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2000 11:49:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 3 Jun 2000 11:49:28 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12yCJf-0006Sl-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2000 12:42:11 +0100 Received: from mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz ([203.96.92.15]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12yCJd-0006Sf-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2000 12:42:10 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [202.27.178.135] by mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20000603114133.XRHC19584752.mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz@[202.27.178.135]> for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 23:41:33 +1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3938ED38.36F4@xtra.co.nz> Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 23:34:16 +1200 From: "vernall" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-XTRA (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Bessel bandpass filter? References: <3b.5b0ebd6.2669f0ef@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: WarmSpgs@aol.com wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > Bessel filters do have wonderful group delay characteristics, and a bandpass > version is entirely mathematically realisable...but not especially useful. I was not planning to use one. My query was about apparent lack of a band pass version being mentioned in text books. > The skirts of such a filter are so gentle that there is little point in using > it for communications audio filtering unless you used many, many stages. If > you were to do that, however, the inevitable minor defects in the physical > realisation would likely result in phase characteristics little better than a > simpler Butterworth design of comparable steepness. Yes. It seems the stagger tuned Butterworth is the design to go for. > It is not an absolute requirement to have linear phase over the entire band > of interest; only enough of it to allow the shape of the more-or-less square > wave envelope to be reproduced without excessive overshoot. (This could be > as little as 50 Hz of the overall bandwidth for normal CW.) We have been > using brick-wall highpass and lowpass filters in broadcast audio paths for > some time now, exhibiting virtually no ringing or overshoot. This is done > partly by incorporating active phase shift networks to compensate for the > normal huge group delay excursions in the elliptical designs needed to > achieve the required rolloff characteristics. Alas, design formulae for some > of the fancier implementations are hard to come by. > > 73, > John KD4IDY What I am not sure of is how to stagger the stages of bandpass active filters. However, they can easily be tweaked, and applying "input beeping" and using a scope to minimise ringing in the output seems to be a good experimental way of adjusting it for the desired characteristic. Thanks for the comments. Bob ZL2CA