Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13560 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2000 13:34:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2000 13:34:27 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 135TWY-0000Hh-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:29:34 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 135TWW-0000Hc-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:29:33 +0100 Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id OAA12502; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:33:56 +0100 (BST) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 30816 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2000 14:23:53 -0000 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 23 Jun 2000 14:23:53 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id OAA10053; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:22:41 GMT Received: from unknown(10.71.64.31) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma009987; Fri, 23 Jun 00 14:22:06 GMT Received: from frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:35:37 +0100 Received: by frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:27:55 +0100 Message-ID: <3617AC3245C2D1118A840000F805359C01AB8CDC@pdw-mercury-1.dera.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Re: Shrinking sounds - fiasco Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:27:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Well, the way I do it is to use a mixed down frequency centred on zero and use low pass filtering to give bandpass when mixed back up for listening. As described the method would need some low pass filtering as part of the initial mixing down process. Filtering may well also be needed in the final upconversion process Andy >>3) and 4) can be taken together - if using an FIR filter, the filtering >>process needs to be done for each decimated sample only - this saves >>considerable processing overhead for the long filter tap lengths >>necessary > > >If you plan to combine steps 3) and 4) by doing first decimating and >then narrow band (sub-Hz) filtering, shouldn't you low pass filter the >signal produced by the mixdown at 2) to have a bandwidth less than 15 >Hz for the final 31.25 Hz sample rate to meet the Nyquist criteria ? > >Paul OH3LWR -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.