Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8510 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 10:49:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 10:49:02 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12ze31-0006od-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 12:30:59 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12ze2y-0006oY-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 12:30:56 +0100 Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id LAA08396; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:48:02 +0100 (BST) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 21739 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 11:38:59 -0000 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 11:38:59 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id LAA17509; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:39:01 GMT Received: from unknown(10.71.64.31) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma017482; Wed, 7 Jun 00 11:38:35 GMT Received: from frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:49:28 +0100 Received: by frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:42:29 +0100 Message-ID: <3617AC3245C2D1118A840000F805359C01AB8CA1@pdw-mercury-1.dera.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Formula Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:42:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Walter et al :- Doesn't specifying a dipole as the radiator automatically take antenna aperture into account, and cancels out frequency from the equation ? So if you take just the spreading out of the total power over the area of a sphere : Watts per m^2 = P . / (D ^ 2 x 4.pi) and E ( V/m ) = SQTR( Power x. Resistance of free space ) so Volts / m = SQRT(W/m^2 * Z free space) = SQRT(P x 377 / 4.pi / D^2) = SQRT(P) * 30 / D A dipole has a gain of 1.64 (power) so its "voltage gain" could be said to be 1.28 so I reckon the formula should read E (V/m) = 38.4 . SQRT(P) / D (all in SI units of course) Some way off a value of 7, but in the right region. Can anyone spot if I've slipped a digit or something ? Andy G4JNT > ---------- > From: Walter Blanchard[SMTP:blanch@pncl.co.uk] > Reply To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: 2000-06-07 10:25 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Formula > > I found the following in an article recently. > > Quote: > > "The intensity E (known as the field strength) of a transmission > at a distance D from a source transmitting P watts of RF power via > a half-wave dipole in a free, unobstructed space, can be estimated > using the formula: > > E=(7*sqrt (P))/D. > > Thus, for a 2 watt transmitter, the theoretical field strength in free > space at one metre distance is approximately 10 V/m and at 100 metres > distance 0.1 V/m" > > This formula is new to me and I can't find it in any > textbooks I have. Since it ignores frequency shouldn't > it be power flux per unit area and not field strength? > Can anyone tell me where it comes from? > > Walter G3JKV. > > > -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.