Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20000626103601.2c7f79f2@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:36:01
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: LF: LFCC Award Proposal
In-reply-to: <3.0.3.32.20000623164605.007b0370@highnoonfilm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

>PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A LOW FREQUENCY CENTURY CLUB AWARD (LFCC)
>By Les Rayburn, KT4OZ
>
> ...
>
>0-100Khz (VLF Endorsement): Award would be granted to those operators who
>could verify reception of stations in 25 Maidenhead grid squares.
Endorsements
>for each additional 25 stations.
>
>76Khz (Amateur VLF Endorsement): Award would be granted to those operators
>who could verify two way contacts with or reception of stations in 10 
>Maidenhead grid squares. Endorsements for each additional 10 grid squares.
>
> ...
>
>136Khz (Amateur LF Endorsement): Award would be granted to those operators
>who could verify two way contacts with or reception of stations in 25 
>Maidenhead grid squares. Endorsements for each additional 25 grid squares.
>

Good idea, but is does not agree with the 'official ranges' :
VLF = 3 to 30kHz
LF = 30 to 300 kHz
So the 75kHz UK allocation is actually LF, not VLF

73, Rik ON7YD