Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1761 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 01:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 01:42:25 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12zVVG-0004is-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 03:23:34 +0100 Received: from tomts1.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.139] helo=tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12zVVF-0004if-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 03:23:33 +0100 Received: from server1 ([206.172.245.58]) by tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20000607013635.TCPM18496.tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net@server1> for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:36:35 -0400 Message-ID: <006a01bfd01f$e2380930$0a00a8c0@server1.ThreeLakes.ca> From: "Larry Kayser" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: a really weak signal in Canada.... Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:28:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Alberto: >> I recorded some 578 seconds of audio to hard disk at 7200 samples per sec. >> [snip] > >Seems really a good idea, which could attract also the >die-hard CW-must-be-copied-by-ears crop around. > >Just one simple question : why 7200 samples/sec ? It is not a standard >sound card sampling rate. Is there a specific reason for this sampling speed ? >Perhaps Bill was using an external A/D converter. For the technique to >become widespread and accepted by many (all), it shouldn't rely on an >ad-hoc hardware. Modern sound cards have superb A/D converters, >so why not use them ? Yes, your right sound cards today are at least good. However Bill started his work way back and he uses a small card that implements in discrete logic a Sigma Delta A/D, published in QST in 1992. The card runs the serial port at 115200 baud with 10 of the 16 bits being a full async character with start bit, 8 data bits, and a stop bit. the blank 6 bits let the processor get some work done between data characters. http://www.ietc.ca/home/bill/bbs.htm if you go and look and download some of the material at Bills web site you can see how he does things. >For the technique to >become widespread and accepted by many (all), it shouldn't rely on an >ad-hoc hardware. Fair opinion for you Alberto, possibly relevant in your terms. >Modern sound cards have superb A/D converters, >so why not use them ? Computer sound cards did not exist when Bill started his work, since they were not available they were not used. Having been around A/D converters for many years, the superlative of "superb A/D converters" seems to have a degree of hyperbole from my perspective. Bill will probably speak to the sound card issue at some point in the future, that is his choice of course. In the interim he has done DSP work that is superb for weak signal work and has been demonstrated to perform excellently. Larry VA3LK