Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20223 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 18:30:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 18:30:39 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 137MU2-00018Y-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:22:46 +0100 Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.195.173]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 137MU1-00018T-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:22:45 +0100 Received: from modem-101.angrim.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.113.101] helo=robing) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 137MTy-0007Mx-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:22:43 +0100 Message-ID: <001101bfe125$c0b6aca0$6571883e@robing> From: robin@g3lba.freeserve.co.uk To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Subject: Re: LF: Petr's Easygram Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:24:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dividing by Zero is easy.... My Windows PC tries it all the time!! Robin ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:41 PM Subject: Re: LF: Petr's Easygram > >>I am trying to work out how to use a bandwidth of -10Hz, before > >> he removes it from the menu! > > >Don't remove this one. It should give better than infinite signal to > >noise ratio. You should be able to light a small city with the output > >from a signal that you just thought might be on the air. > > Actually, I suspect it would take a bandwidth closer to -30Hz to achieve that > much output. But I'm having a little trouble with the maths necessary to > prove it. This dividing by zero business is harder than I thought.... > > 73, > John KD4IDY > > >