Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8392 invoked from network); 22 May 2000 18:25:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 22 May 2000 18:25:59 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12twno-0003M9-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 May 2000 19:19:44 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from oso.slonet.org ([207.114.180.2] ident=cbuttsch) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12twnm-0003M4-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 May 2000 19:19:43 +0100 Received: from localhost by oso.slonet.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA22098 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:19:38 -0700 (PDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 11:19:38 -0700 (PDT) From: "Clifford Buttschardt" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Morse tones / filters etc. In-reply-to: <003a01bfc415$89018a00$7929f7c2@oemcomputer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Interesting observation on real time listening on LF. When I was at sea as a radio officer I arranged two receivers one vertical and the other horizontal using the longwire 500 kHz antenna tuned to the same frequency within one hertz. Then by using two headphones, each arranged so that opposite ears listened to opposite polarizations, results were simply amazing! With some very weak LF signals and especially with some ten meter satellite signals, I would estimate the readability increased by at least fifty percent. The ease in which signals buried in QRN could be read was something I've wanted to investigate ever since that experiment. Cliff K7RR On Mon, 22 May 2000, John Rabson wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kevin Ravenhill > To: LF Group > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 9:01 AM > Subject: LF: Re: Morse tones / filters etc. > > > > Has anyone experimented with phase shifted / delayed audio, i.e. with > "raw" > > audio fed to one half of the headphones and a (variably) phase-shifted / > > delayed version fed to the other half? > > This reminds me of the Sterocode processor developed by G6CJ and (I think) > G3OTK, which was written up in September 75 RadCom. This unit took a mono > output from the receiver and produced a pseudo-stereo output to feed to a > suitable pair of headphones. It worked quite well on top band and even > helped on 80 m SSB in the evening when it appeared to spread out TV time > base QRM across a perceived range of directions of about 90 degrees . The > speech seemed not to be spread out so much. This is all highly subjective, > but it did seem to do something useful. > > 73 de > John Rabson G3PAI > > > > >