Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25125 invoked from network); 3 May 2000 16:14:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 3 May 2000 16:14:36 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12n1gh-0000wu-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 May 2000 17:07:47 +0100 Received: from d06lmsgate.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.1]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12n1gZ-0000wl-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 May 2000 17:07:43 +0100 Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate.uk.ibm.COM (1.0.0) with ESMTP id QAA162726 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 16:56:28 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from usa.net (lig32-239-133-69.emea.lig-dial.ibm.com [32.239.133.69]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v2.07) with ESMTP id RAA35468 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:06:42 +0100 Message-ID: <39104E84.1C401FE5@usa.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 18:06:28 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" Organization: Undisclosed X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: IK1ODO beacon signal References: <4.1.20000502221259.02234f10@mailer.inrete.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >>Further I noticed that launching another application while running Spectran >>caused a kind of 'frequency shift' (see screenshot at my webpage). >> >Alberto found this same problem, but he says that debugging will be difficult, >and will probably take some time. Incidentally, he is releasing a new "beta" >version (beta3). Just to straigthen things a bit up : we are talking of two different problems : 1) The frequency error Marco is talking about, is known to me since some time, and it is caused by a wrong initial design assumption of Spectran, i.e. that the frequency ruler scale must start at an integral multiple of 1 Hz. This because at that time Spectran was meant for EME use, where sub-Hertz resolutions are not needed. Now that with beta 3 we can do down to 21 milliHz, this must revised. 2) The frequency shift observed and reported by Rik and Alan, is a completely new thing, for which, at the moment, I have no explanation. I saw, one time only, a shift of 0.5 Hz, which I attributed to my RX. I wasn't launching or using any other application at the moment. As this shift has been signalled by more than one person, and on signals locked to some standards, then I must investigated into it. Thanks for those reports, and don't be shy to send others. The very first reason for putting out a beta before the final release was just to receive this kind of reports. 73s Alberto I2PHD -----------------