Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2145 invoked from network); 2 May 2000 18:47:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 2 May 2000 18:47:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12mhYF-0007NY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 May 2000 19:37:43 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12mhYC-0007NS-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 May 2000 19:37:41 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from as32-s15-148-14.cwci.net ([195.44.148.14] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12mhXs-0003fB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 May 2000 18:37:22 +0000 Message-ID: <390F09BB.ECB76C6@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 17:00:44 +0000 From: "g3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb" Subject: LF: transatlantic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Larry and Co Have just returned from Cookstown/N.I- IO64PO, after conducting some experiments both transmitting and receiving to access possibilities for November. The qth is ideal for receiving, using the 120 ft tower, the environment is very quiet, could hear a pin drop. On transmit I was only using a few mwatts erp and worked SM nearly 900 miles away and other continental stations plus the usual UK stations. One problem that most suffer from is the inability to receive properly because of the noisy environment that they live in. This will be the biggest problem with the November tests. In my case both my Scarborough and Cookstown sites which are rural do not have this problem. I have the antenna array and radial system all set up but will be there again in July to perfect it and implement some refinements, plus test the new tx at 1w erp. When I was there I monitored CFH early morning and it was always quite strong but on the 250400 between 0810 and 0840 it was very strong over S9 and band conditions excellent, not a trace of qrn, this could have been a oppertunity to work each other. Even at this time of year there are possibilities of openings. Hope this info helps in some positive way to ascertain what might be possible. My antenna consisted of 2 x inv L antennas each one 120 ft high and 350 ft long about 160 degrees apart directed towards the west. I will be adding an additional inv L at the same hight but at least 600 ft long, this will be facing East. The radial system consists of insulated radials about 300 ft long and the far end connected to sheep lattice metal fencing that runs for miles. This I hope will achieve the object when the time comes. I will be using normal hand sent CW but also have a pentium III pc with the appropriate software to send and monitor slow cw if necessary. My operation Larry is a one man band but I have been offered help from several competent cw operators if I need them to keep watch 24 hours a day for the test period. In the UK, November might be a bad month for Thunder/Lightening etc wiping out the rx end. One other thought, when working with weak signals a local qso might start up and wipe out the whole operation at times !!!!!!!!!!!1 It would be hard to co-ordinate every operator on the band. 73 de Mal/G3KEV