Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13060 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 11:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 May 2000 11:39:40 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12s21f-0001H7-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 May 2000 12:30:07 +0100 Received: from helios.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.2]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12s21c-0001H2-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 May 2000 12:30:04 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [147.197.200.44] (helo=gemini) by helios.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12s21G-0000ja-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 May 2000 12:29:42 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <28528.200005171129@gemini> From: "James Moritz" Organization: University of Hertfordshire To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:36:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear LF Group, This weekend, I am hoping to make another expedition to the Puckeridge Decca station, which has been made available again through the good offices of G3JKV and the Crawley club. The main motive for this expedition is to do some back-to-back comparisons between a big antenna (the 100m Decca mast) and a small, amateur-type antenna (an inverted L about 9m high and 50m long). The idea is to set the antenna currents so that the same effective radiated power should be obtained from both antennas, and then see how signal strengths compare. There has been some vigorous debate lately about the advantages and disadvantages of big and small antennas, with some holding the view that big antennas have superior radiation patterns to small ones, and some holding the opposite is true. The aim of the experiment is to put this to a practical test. We did this before during the previous trip to Puckeridge, but due to time pressures and the dreadful weather, relatively little operating was done using the two antenna setup. The results then were that the two antennas gave roughly the same results, when transmitter power was set for same ERP from each antenna (this meant feeding about 500W into the small antenna, and less than 0.5W into the main mast!). For this weekend, I have put together a tuner/attenuator circuit that will hopefully allow changing between the antennas with a single switch, making the comparison much quicker and more direct. I am hoping this will enable lots more people to take part. The level of ERP will be very roughly 100mW for both antennas. The plan for the weekend is roughly this: Friday evening - Install gear Saturday morning - get working, and obtain comparative reports. Later on Saturday - run station at 1W ERP from main antenna Sunday - open to suggestions; I have notified RA in case anyone would like to try 73kHz QSO's. Sunday afternoon - pack up and go home. Due to this being a small-scale expedition, I will probably stick to normal CW, but might be prevailed upon to drag my PC across a field if people are really keen to hear some QRSS....... Of course, nothing ever goes entirely according to plan, but it should be fun. Any QSO's, listener reports or measurements would be welcome. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU