Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3185 invoked from network); 18 May 2000 10:25:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 18 May 2000 10:25:46 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12sNOs-0003T1-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:30 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12sNOp-0003Sw-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:28 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from central.zetnet.co.uk (central.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.20]) by irwell.zetnet.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id LAA11101 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:05 +0100 X-ZSender: g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk Message-ID: <2000051810113968199@zetnet.co.uk> Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:11:39 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Peter Dodd" X-Mailer: ZIMACS Version 1.20c 10000836 Subject: LF: Re: LF receivers Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit I am working on the Receiver chapter for the LF book. I have a good introduction written by John 4GVC (with a description of the TS850, which caused many of us, including myself, to go this route) but would like to bring it up to date in the light of your collective experience. While I was up at Crawley I found that Derek was using the 990 to good effect. What is your favorite receiver and how does it compare with others that you might have tried? -- Regards, Peter, G3LDO