Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25661 invoked from network); 18 May 2000 19:50:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 18 May 2000 19:50:08 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12sWCv-0007tq-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 20:43:45 +0100 Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.195.173]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12sWCs-0007tg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 20:43:42 +0100 Received: from modem-141.erchamion.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.195.141] helo=lvm) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 12sWCS-0003u5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 20:43:16 +0100 Message-ID: <000201bfc101$78b32e40$8dc3883e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Re. LF Recievers Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 20:43:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Further to my previous note I forgot to mention that the 781 tunes in 10Hz steps 2.5Khz per revolution of the knob wheras the 756 can be set to 1hz steps with 500 Hz per revolution! which is of course much better.So far as weak signals are concerned I could find no difference between the two recievers. 73s again Laurie.L