Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20842 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2000 00:34:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 5 Apr 2000 00:34:27 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12cdgV-0001fJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:28:39 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from imo22.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.66]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12cdgS-0001fD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:28:36 +0100 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id l.c6.37692b1 (4366) for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 20:27:47 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 20:27:47 EDT Subject: Re: LF: Decca Masts To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 138 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: In a message dated 4/4/00 4:43:31 PM GMT Daylight Time, blanch@pncl.co.uk writes: << Decca masts - latest situation. Agreement with Racal obtained. Schedule of available stations upcoming. RSGB notified; support of HF Cttee promised. Applications for possible NOV's in process. >> Firstly. Thank you Walter and the DMG for a unique opportunity. However, I'm a little concerned about the prospect of two dozen individuals phoning the RA trying to get various NOV's for higher power / changes in main station address to avoid /P etc. It may appear a tad unprofessional. Does the "DMG" have any suggestions about how this can be co-ordinated so that we collectively retain the respect of the licensing authority? e.g. Single call and NOV per site etc. Guidance required please. What are the NOV's mentioned above? 73 David G0MRF