Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29594 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2000 15:25:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 15 Apr 2000 15:25:20 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12gUL1-0004Ow-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:18:23 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12gUL0-0004Or-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:18:22 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [195.44.223.78] (helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12gUKn-0001BZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:18:09 +0000 Message-ID: <38F87936.37BFB7E7@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:14:14 +0000 From: "g3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Field Strength G3WSC References: <39.3c35684.2629b33c@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi David/g0mrf Did detect the TX change. Your tx was reasonably clean last night. When I heard G3YXM this morning the whole band was covered with key clicks. Offer him some advice to rid the tx of the key clicks so we all can work on the band at the same time. This morn I had to squeeze in on the LF side of his signal because it was impossible to work hf because of the clicks. In spite of all that has been stated recently about controlling key clicks and harmonic suppression, no one seems to be doing anything about it, blatant disregard for other band users. If this is to become the norm then I will have no alternative but to take the matter up with the RIS and get their opinion about having the signals monitored. The holder of the high power NOV ought to take some responisbility bearing in mind that this station is only a couple of hundred kilometres away from others trying to operate on an already congested band, especially at weekends. If the G3WSC site was several hundred kilometres or more away from the rest of us there might not be a problem with the high power. At present 1 w erp is more than adequate for the size/efficiency of the tower in use and distances around europe to be covered. What is the point getting a report of S9 plus 20 -60 dbs over when only receiving the other end at S3 on average and below. Total incompatibility between stations. Communications procedures dictate that you use the mimimum power necessary to establish and maintain a radio contract. Imagine the chaos on 136 khz if we all ventured down this road. This qrm key click problem needs to be sorted out before the Transatlantic II project so that all participants get an equal chance and no one transmission wipes the rest out. Surely one ought to be content with the 350 tower and around 1w erp without going over the top with excess power and chewing the band up for those operating from their home qth. Low power slow morse and data operators in these circumstances dont stand much chance. Expect a blurred spiky screen. G3KEV