Return-Path: Received: (qmail 542 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2000 11:01:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 25 Apr 2000 11:01:26 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12k2tH-0003ha-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:48:27 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12k2t8-0003gJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:48:19 +0100 Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id LAA20437; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:51:04 +0100 (BST) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 10783 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2000 11:44:45 -0000 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 25 Apr 2000 11:44:45 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id KAA17473; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:34:20 GMT Received: from unknown(146.80.11.40) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma017369; Tue, 25 Apr 00 10:33:52 GMT Received: from frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:39:31 +0100 Received: by FRN-GOLD-1 with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id <2J099MT6>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:33:57 +0100 Message-ID: <3617AC3245C2D1118A840000F805359C0175288F@pdw-mercury-1.dera.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: Carrier on 137.7446 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:33:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I got the impression that carrier has only appeared recently - withn the last couple of months anyway, but my memory is probably fading with age ! I spotted it since It was sitting only a few 10s of Hz from where Marco was transmitting his low power tests. The interferer caused no problems but did depress the AGC of the receiver somewhat in the 300 Hz bandwidth filter. On this subject, does anyone know of a low-cost source of 455 kHz (series resonance) crystals. I want to make up a ladder filter for the RA1792 with a much narrower bandwidth than the 300 Hz mechanical filter included. I've made a ladder filter at a centre frequency of 32765.5 Hz using watch crystals, this has a bandwidth of 1.5 Hz but this would need a down followed by up conversion to include within the receiver. A crystal controlled LO capable of being pulled over the 10 Hz step size would allow this filter to be built into the Rx, and would not need a terribly stable conversion (provided it stayed within the bandwidth of the ladder filter) as the drift of this oscillator would cancel out the down followed by upconversion to 455 kHz. Just a thought, but a ladder filter at 455 would be a lot easier. Andy G4JNT > ---------- > From: Peter Dodd[SMTP:g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk] > Reply To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: 2000-04-24 23:21 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Carrier on 137.7446 > > Andy Talbot said > > > There has been a strong carrier on 137.7446 kHz for at least a week. > No > > modulation and strength doesn't seem to vary. > > Can anyone else hear this ? > > Yes, I can. It is so consistant (ever since we were allocated the > band) that I use it as frequency check marker when using Spectran or > Gram. It is clearly audible so I use it to check my receiver/antenna > system on audio CW as well. I understand that the signal originates > in France but I can't remember where I got this information. > > > -- > Regards, Peter, G3LDO > > > > -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.