Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7807 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 12:59:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 12 Apr 2000 12:59:20 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fMbo-0000Uw-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:51:04 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fMbm-0000Ur-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:51:03 +0100 Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id NAA25551; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:53:31 +0100 (BST) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 26877 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 13:45:54 -0000 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 12 Apr 2000 13:45:54 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id MAA17238; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:38:44 GMT Received: from unknown(146.80.11.40) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma017208; Wed, 12 Apr 00 12:38:16 GMT Received: from frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:53:34 +0100 Received: by FRN-GOLD-1 with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id <2J097382>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:48:42 +0100 Message-ID: <3617AC3245C2D1118A840000F805359C01752857@PDW-MERCURY-1> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: "'LF Group'" Subject: LF: Coil winding conundrum Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:48:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Moving from LF to MF for a bit, here's a problem for the topband operators and loading coil winders. At the weekend I made a loading coil to resonate the LF Tee antenna on topband. 34uH was needed and the only suitable former to hand was 40mm plastic drain pipe - the white type with no significant RF loss. First off I used 27 turns close wound of 1mm enamelled wire (which was all that I had of that wire), and completed the coil with 20 turns of 0.7mm diameter tinned copper with turns wide spaced at 3mm to allow tapping points. This worked fine but I noticed the coil got a bit warm with 100 Watts and decided I needed a higher Q.... So, I made some Litz wire by twisting 20 strands of 0.25 mm diameter enamelled, which gives a copper X-sectional area a bit more than 1mm diameter equivalent. Overall Litz wire diameter about 1.8mm. 40 turns of this, close wound with a few taps gave near enough the same inductance value for a winding length of 72mm Q was measured by connecting a 680pF cap in parallel, exciting the circuit with a one turn coupling coil driven from a synth, very loosely coupled and monitoring voltage across the coil with a x10 scope probe. Peak response frequency was noted and then the points either side where the response fell to -3dB (0.707) to get the bandwidth. Then Qu = CF / BW Now for the interesting bit. When it came to measure the unloaded Q of each coil, the original one was a fair bit higher at Qu = 140, compared with the Litz wound coil with Qu = 95. Both coils were the same diameter, same inductance, and roughly the same length in total. So why was the one made of plain wire better ? Self capacitance ? Q was only measured at 1 MHz, perhaps I should try measuring gain at a lower frequency. Puzzled and curious.................. One interesting aside to come out though. Rayners formula for inductance predicted the values of each coil to better than 10% and bears out observations I've made over the years - such a simple formula for wound inductors is too good to be true, working over a range in excess of 1000000 : 1 L(uh) = (D.N) ^ 2 / (460.D + 1020 * length) D = mean diameter, mm N = turns Andy G4JNT -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.