Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28714 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2000 09:08:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 16 Apr 2000 09:08:27 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12gkso-0006hZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:58:22 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from hs-img-3.compuserve.com ([149.174.177.148] helo=sphmgaac.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12gksn-0006h0-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:58:21 +0100 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by sphmgaac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) id EAA21119 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:57:37 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:55:37 -0400 From: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" Subject: LF: Special Measurements 2 by OH2LX To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200004160455_MC2-A161-A026@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Veino, > 2. Due to ITU and EBU requirements we are engaged > to use relative unit dB(mW), after some problems > with our customers we have adopted "dBmW" instead > of normal "dBm". In fact ITU regularly uses "dBW". > Is the use of "dBu" based on some agreements?< thank you very much for your valuable measurements. I recall we already discussed the misleading unit we see from time to time. The only reason I was using dBu (not dB microVolt but dBu) is that the relatively cheap selective level meters I use (Praecitronic MV6/62 and Siemens D2108) were originally used for level measurements on telephone lines, with 0 dBu = 0.775 Volt at 75 Ohm. In the meantime I have found a way to measure the actual field strength by means of a 1m diameter loop, so I know the relationship between my receiver signal strength and the field strength (0 dBu equivalent to 108 dBuV/m) , so I recently changed the information in my logbook on my homepage into dB microVolt/m. I believe that this, together with the CCIR curve give a better indication about the propagation modes and probably the ERP someone uses -- at least in direct comparison. Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) P.S.: hope you catch my signal one of these days, I would love to have a figure on my field strength in OH ... pretty small, as I suppose, with 30 mW ERP P.S.2: Veino, a question to you as the expert: are the CCIR curves valid for ERP or EIRP? The curves state that they were calculated for a power of 1 kW from a "short monopole" antenna. Does this mean, we are comparing our curves to 1kW EIRP? Is the 40 kW radiated power of DC39 that Gamal and I measured (in comparison to the CCIR curves) EIRP or ERP?