Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22465 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2000 16:16:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by redlabel.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 13 Apr 2000 16:16:41 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fmAg-0005Mm-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:08:46 +0100 Received: from tomts1.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.139] helo=tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fmAf-0005Mh-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:08:45 +0100 Received: from server1 ([206.172.245.19]) by tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20000413160755.HRJC28912.tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net@server1> for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:07:55 -0400 Message-ID: <006301bfa562$24643bf0$0a00a8c0@server1.ThreeLakes.ca> From: "Larry Kayser" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: What is normal amateur radio? Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:05:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Gentlemen: This discussion of what is normal amateur radio is a never ending discourse that occurs every time we have change, especially if the change looks like it might be a quantum change. When I was a child and had just gotten my license the first time, the Net Control station for the 80 Meter net at my home phoned my father at his office and asked him to stop me from calling into the Manitoba Phone Net on 3760 with my SSB rig, I was fouling up the Net..... When we got a bunch of old Model 12 and 14 teletype machines and got them running on 80 we were told that we would wreck the National Traffic System. In 1969 I built my first FM repeater up in Sault Ste Marie, Ontario and there was a loud uproar from the existing AM Crowd, a group of three, about the awful modulation and the wide signal of the station on their regenerative receivers. In 1978 a small team in Ottawa, one of three teams in Canada, built a Packet Radio system and we incidentally coined the term "Digipeater". There was a heated and very vociferous discussion that microcomputers were most certainly not part of Amateur Radio. I frequently meet other CW operators who vigorously promote that the use of a Keyboard on CW is not real CW operating. These same people used to be very upset with those who first used some DTL logic to build a Keyer and use a Paddle, they were not real CW operators either. My amateur radio may not fit with the definitions of amateur radio that are acceptable to some other radio amateurs. Guess, what? That is OK! I just ask that you exercise your rights as you see them in amateur radio and I will try hard not to let my rights be a point of distress to you. We have lots of room, even in 2.1 Khz at LF, to do a lot of things and have a lot of fun and we definitely can do some things that the existing LF community, Government or Otherwise, have never done before. I have always been able to tell when I am out front of the pack, I am constantly reaching around and ripping the spears and arrows out of my back, but I also know that goes with the fun of doing something new. 73 Larry VA3LK