Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11726 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2000 09:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 3 Apr 2000 09:56:55 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12c3Sm-00073f-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 10:48:04 +0100 Received: from [195.84.240.90] (helo=mail.westerstrand.se) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12c3Sj-00072g-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 10:48:02 +0100 Received: from can.westerstrand.se ([192.168.1.67]) by mail.westerstrand.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31257 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:46:42 +0200 Message-ID: <000601bf9d51$85fc9ce0$4301a8c0@can.westerstrand.se> From: "Christer Andersson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: SV: LF: New FS measurements Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:46:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >If you (re)match for the same applied power, the gain by having lower >loop resistance is 20log(R1/R2). Your data indicates a gain of +0.7 dB >from resistance ratio. As I wrote in my first mail, the antenna current was unchanged, i.e. the TX power was somewhat reduced. /Christer sm6pxj