Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <MvbB5AAv6ox4MwDF@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:32:31 +0000
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Tom Boucher" <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: 73kHz to PA0SE
In-reply-to: <23789.200003081150@gemini>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Jim

You were a good 569 with me in Devon. I had intended calling you again
after you (and Peter) had finished with Dick, but a delivery van of
kitchen furniture turned up so I had to go and attend to that!

Peter you were an excellent 579.

73, Tom G3OLB 

In message <23789.200003081150@gemini>, James Moritz
<j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk> writes
>Dear LF Group,
>
>       Thanks to Dick, PA0SE for the normal CW, cross-band QSO 
>yesterday afternoon. We had no problem exchanging 559 reports. 
>Thanks also to Tom, G3OLB for standing by on 136kHz - I found it 
>a bit confusing at times!
>
>This experience suggests there might be other possibilities for 
>similar cross-band, normal CW QSO's, particularly if Rugby is off 
>the air for maintenance again - worth thinking about for next month.
>
>Sent several QRSS cross-band CQ's last night on 71.8kHz from 
>about 1945 onwards -  didn't see any replies, though. Will try again 
>on Friday, or at other times if someone would like a sked.
>
>Cheers, Jim Moritz
>73 de M0BMU
>