Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19862 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2000 14:40:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 3 Mar 2000 14:40:47 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12Qt3J-000028-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:27:37 +0000 Received: from mail04.hostcenter.com ([195.186.64.57]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12Qt3F-000022-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:27:34 +0000 Received: from www303.hostcenter.com (195.186.64.84) by mail04.hostcenter.com (RS ver 1.0.53) with SMTP id 06094935 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 15:27:11 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38C04ABD.F9EFDB90@phonakcom.ch> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 15:29:02 -0800 From: "Toni Baertschi" Organization: Phonak Communications AG X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 73kHz this evening References: <1031.200003031324@gemini> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Loop-Detect: 1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: What is your exact frequency on 73? 73 de HB2ASB James Moritz wrote: > Dear LF Group, > I Intend to be on 73kHz this evening - probably won't be home > much before 2000utc, so will be on the air a little after that. I also > intend to operate Saturday morning from around 0800 for an hour > at least, to try to take advantage of lower noise levels that will > hopefully exist at some QTH's in the morning. I will be using normal > CW and QRSS. > > For the last few days, the Rugby TX has been putting out a carrier > at about 73.15kHz, and a RTTY - like signal with 100Hz shift and > 73.3kHz centre frequency. I am not sure whether this actually > reduces the noise level lower down the band, but it does seem to > be more organised into broad lines, rather than the continuous > mush it was previously - so this could benefit QRSS signals. > > Hope to see you later, > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU