Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16727 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2000 18:09:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by redlabel.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 6 Mar 2000 18:09:24 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12S1pP-0002E9-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:01:59 +0000 Received: from as-img-5.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.148] helo=spamgaae.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12S1pL-0002Ds-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:01:55 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spamgaae.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) id NAA26883 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:01:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:01:00 -0500 From: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: 73/136 x-band To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200003061301_MC2-9BF6-F80A@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik (and others), >I will use my 136kHz for reception on 73kHz, I wonder if that will be >sufficient. nice that the 73 kHz fever broke out! Rik, for me my 136 kHz equipment was quite sufficient (as I wrote earlier) I did NOT even tune my antenna, noise level here at 73 kHz is lower compared to 136 kHz, and if I see those strong signals on the 4000m band, it is hard to be strong enough in my character not to try to tune my G0MRF PA and antenna system for that band .... (yes, I have been told it would work ... my DDS synthesizer works there anyhow ...). Mike, I will be QRV tonight, lets see ... 73 Geri , DK8KW (W1KW)