Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2433 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2000 20:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 6 Feb 2000 20:57:11 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12HYcC-0005rV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 20:49:04 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from smtper.inrete.it ([212.110.32.184] helo=mailer.inrete.it) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12HYcA-0005rQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 20:49:02 +0000 Received: from cel266 ([151.25.252.129]) by mailer.inrete.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA27365 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:48:50 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:48:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4.1.20000206204040.009d7ea0@mailer.inrete.it> X-Sender: spin@mailer.inrete.it X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Versione 4.1 Data: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 21:05:00 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "M. Bruno" Subject: LF: Re: LF Propagation thoughts (and antenna, too) In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20000206170320.00862560@laatikko.saunalahti.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: In 21.36 06/02/00 , Vaino OH2LX wrote: >Some thoughts on 136 kHz Ionospheric propagation > >Sorry for this not being in phase with T/A ideas. > ................. > >On the practicability of talking about "hops" > >Suggested experiment: Draw a circle with a radius >of 63.70 cm. Then draw a slightly bigger circle >with radius of 64.50 cm, using same center point. >With a reflection height of some 80 to 90 km the >space between the concentric circles is small..? >Pictures are 99% drawn to a completely wrong scale. >Might be better talk abt "bends" instead of "hops". > >Not all active hams are interested on this kind >of digging into propagation details. For those who >are, I'll be glad to calculate selected paths etc. > Dear Vaino, please, continue your 'digging'. If our main objective in this fantastic hobby is self-instruction, we must have somebody teaching and helping us to remain with feet on Earth, even looking at the ionosphere ... ;-) May be true that not all active hams are interested; but I firmly believe that the main scope of this reflector is to put hams with similar interests in touch, and many of us must be concerned about wave propagation, to make better QSO or simply to try to understand. Your suggested experiment is very clear. In effect we are used to figure the ionospheric layers as an high ceiling; compared with the earth radius it is very low. I have a question for antenna modelling gurus (G3LDO?) What is the vertical radiation pattern of our shortened verticals? Is it dependent of ground resistance and nearby objects? may we model it? Marco Bruno - IK1ODO spin@inrete.it SPIN Electronics - www.spin-it.com