Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17387 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2000 13:58:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 2 Feb 2000 13:58:47 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12G00M-0006fn-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:39:34 +0000 Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.de ([194.25.134.19]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12G00K-0006fi-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:39:32 +0000 Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 12G00A-0007DQ-01; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:39:22 +0100 Received: from (087321565-0001@[62.158.201.3]) by fwd03.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 12Fzzv-2IhpdxC; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:39:07 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 References: <12FesM-0Y9MaOC@fwd07.sul.t-online.de> <3.0.6.32.20000202093713.0084b7c0@laatikko.saunalahti.fi> Subject: Re: LF: Change of ground resistance due to frozen ground X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:39:07 +0100 Message-ID: <12Fzzv-2IhpdxC@fwd03.sul.t-online.de> X-Sender: 087321565-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear all, when collecting reports about changing ground resistance changes due to frozen ground (and the ground covered with snow) I think we must take into account the following difference: Commercial stations with a well elaborated ground system may not notice this effect as much as radio amateurs who have limited possibilities to install effetive ground systems. At present I am just using my house ground for LF. I have noticed the difference in the antenna match (up to S = 2), I have measured the direction of the change, I will repeat these measurements in the next winter season, and I will install something to be able to re-match to this change. All other observations, preferably from other radio amateurs, however, are welcome. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB Vaeinoe Lehtoranta schrieb: > In Finland we have some experience with frost. > Information about its effects on ground wave > propagation is not very well established. > Same with TV & FM space wave (I am not talking > about frost on antennas). What effect frost can > have on higher angle sky wave component on > LF, MF or even HF frequencies, I just wonder... > > I do have some frost depth statistics from > Southern Finland and have tried to find some > correlation between measured LF/MF ground wave > values and frost. The stations both flight and > and ground (fixed qth) measured consist of: > > - One LF BC station, Lahti 254/252 kHz, 200 kW, > - Several MF BC stations, two still active, > - More than 100 MF aviation beacons (NDB & L), > - A total of some 10 maritime MF DGPS beacons. > > YLE measurements began in the 1950's but only > VHF/UHF will continue after 1st Jan 2000. Private > LF measurements continue from my poor qth... > > Finnish NDB's and locators (LO/LI) presently use > either 11 m or 14 m high top loaded monopoles. > > Finnish DGPS beacons use a 36 m high top loaded. > > Locator with a 14 m high monopole and 500 W out > radites between 5 and 10 W EMRP (1% to 2%). > > DGPS with a 36 m monopole and 100 W out radiates > approximately 5 W EMRP (5%), or even more. > > Raimo, OH2MRX is real aviation beacon expert > and he reads these messages. He and other CAA > fellows may confirm whether frost plays some > significant role on NDB/L behaviour. > > According to our experiences, as propagation > researches something happens in beacons close > environment when the water content changes > from liquid to solid or vice versa. > >From long time ground wave measurements we can > easily see that the most significant variable > to effect indicated F-s values is air temperature. > This was documented already in the 1940-1950's. > Earth net efficiency varies from case to case. > > 73 de Vaino, OH2LX > > > > > At 19:20 2.2.2000 +1300, you wrote: > >Hans-Joachim Brandt wrote: > > > >> Besides just noting the change It would have been interesting, of > course, to > >> find out into what direction the ground resistance has changed. On one > of the > >> last cold days and before the snow had disappeared I checked it with a > resistive > >> bridge to find that the total feed point resistance of my antenna (when > tuned to > >> resonance) had decreased from 100 ohms down to 60 ohms!!! > > > >I do not have a reference at hand to quote a definitive response, but my > >recollection of ground parameter data is that frozen ground is "bad > >news" for ground wave loss, as is fresh water. Your measured result is > >the other way round. I will try to find a text book reference on frozen > >ground losses versus unfrozen. > > > >By the way, the temperate climate here in Wellington, New Zealand > >involves a few frosts in the winter but no frozen ground as such, so I > >have not experienced the type of conditions that Hans-Joachim is more > >familiar with. > > > >73, Bob ZL2CA > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > V.K.Lehtoranta, OH2LX, POBox 50, FIN-05401 Jokela, Finland > ------ Tel: +358-9-4173965 ---- Fax: +358-9-4173961 ------ > E-mail: vaiski@dlc.fi - alias: oh2lx@dlc.fi & oh2lx@sral.fi >