Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24190 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2000 21:15:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 27 Feb 2000 21:15:23 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12PAuI-0006M3-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:07:14 +0000 Received: from mb09.swip.net ([193.12.122.212]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12PAuG-0006Ly-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:07:13 +0000 Received: from win95 (d212-151-37-194.swipnet.se [212.151.37.194]) by mb09.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA07316 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:06:14 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <000701bf8166$fae4a900$c22597d4@win95.swipnet.se> From: "C Andersson" To: "RSGB LF group" Subject: LF: Field strength revised Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:09:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello All Thanks to PA0SE for suggesting the calibration method. I tried this method this evening and believe I'm somewhat closer to the truth... Obviously the measuring loop with the connection wiring was resonant far lower in frequency than expected. This made the figures a bit optimistic. Now I have a 6,3 dB difference between calculated (2,4 W) and measured radiated power (0,65 W). More details on my home page http://home5.swipnet.se/~w-54761/fs.htm 73 Christer SM6PXJ