Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21184 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2000 19:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 27 Jan 2000 19:32:13 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12DuVa-0001Jv-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:23:10 +0000 Received: from mta3-rme.xtra.co.nz ([203.96.92.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12DuVZ-0001Jm-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:23:10 +0000 Received: from [202.27.178.138] by mta3-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <20000127192220.XUUQ3144.mta3-rme@[202.27.178.138]> for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:22:20 +1300 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3890980D.7B7D@xtra.co.nz> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:10:05 +1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "vernall" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-XTRA (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Automatic ATUs References: <14850.200001271335@gemini> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: James Moritz wrote: > > Dear LF Group, > Many thanks to all those who responded to my request for > information regarding automatic ATUs - I now have several leads > to go on for my research. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU James, Could you please consider putting a summary list on the reflector? I have been considering making an "automatic fine tuner" for LF, for reactance compensation only. I believe that variation of the reactive component of impedance is what is mainly involved with short term changes over wet/dry/ice or whatever environmental conditions. Once the LF antenna has been "tuned and matched" using the likes of a (big) loading coil with taps or L match, the relatively small variations in reactance with changing conditions could be handled with a motor driven variometer (say 50 uH range). This is a whole lot simpler than having the whole tuner automated (more suited to multi-band and multi-antenna scenarios, but not common on LF). 73, Bob ZL2CA